The annex this morning is the order itself, published by the White House on 16 October¹. It is shorter than the commentary about it, and more precise.

Section 2 sets the duties. Goods from Russia: duty raised by 500% ad valorem. Goods from the five largest importers of Russian crude and gas, if they knowingly make new purchases on or after 18 October: plus 100%. Goods from the five largest facilitators of Russian oil sanctions evasion: plus 100%¹.

Section 4 switches them off. Under section 115 of the act, the president waives “any duties” under sections 112 and 113, and the sanctions in a long list of other sections, having certified to Congress that the waiver is in the national interest¹. The waivers “remain in effect until” the president or the secretary of state decides that further action is appropriate¹. There is no end date. The waiver came two days before the law’s implementation deadline³.

What survives. “For the avoidance of doubt”, nothing in the order affects sanctions under the executive orders behind the national emergency on Russia, as continued on 24 March 2026¹. The older architecture stands; the new floor was built and not walked on. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the president would take up to 60 days to assess the economic impact².

What it sits next to. A diesel deal: Russian exports to the United States and others starting at about 2.3 million barrels this month and rising to about 7.6 million barrels a month, according to Trump’s announcement as reported by Reuters². It follows a temporary waiver of sanctions on Russian diesel exports through April 2027³. On Sunday the president wrote that he could sign the sanctions “later, or any time that I want!”⁴. Zelenskyy called the waiver “wrong”³.

The reading. A law with a waiver clause is still a law. The duties exist on paper, the monitoring duty in section 3 exists, and section 5 names which department would pull which lever¹. That is leverage stored, not leverage spent. Whether it is ever spent is a political question. Where it sits, and who holds the switch, is now a matter of public record, which is more than most podium lines leave behind.

Asia took Friday’s American selling into Monday. Early in the session Japan’s Nikkei 225 was down 2.15% and the broader Topix 1.17%; South Korea’s Kospi had lost 1.60%¹. On Friday the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index had slumped 3.8%¹. US stock futures leaned the other way, with S&P 500 contracts up 0.2% and Nasdaq 100 contracts up 0.5%¹.

Oil helped. Brent fell $1.94, or 1.77%, to $107.92 a barrel by 02:27 GMT, after settling on Friday at its highest since 19 May; WTI was at $100.58². The push came from Washington’s waiver of new Russia sanctions and tariffs, which may mean more Russian fuel on the market². This edition’s Annex reads the order itself.

China’s third-quarter numbers beat the poll: growth of 4.5% on a year, against a 4.4% Reuters consensus and 4.3% in the second quarter³. The composition matters more than the beat. Growth leaned on factories and exports, while fixed-asset investment fell 7.2% in the first nine months and September retail sales rose just 1.1%³.

The week’s real calendar is corporate. More than 70 S&P 500 companies report, Tesla and Meta among them¹. Netflix is due on Tuesday; Meta, Tesla, Lam Research and Texas Instruments on Wednesday⁴. After a week in which chip shares were priced on doubts about whether AI spending will earn its keep¹, this is the first fresh evidence: revenue, capital spending and cash flow, printed by the companies themselves.

That is the constructive way to read a red Monday. Moods are cheap and fast. Invoices are slow and audited, and this week a great many of them arrive at once.

Saturday was one of the most violent days of unrest France has seen in years. The interior ministry counted nearly 2,400 arrests and almost 1,000 police officers and gendarmes injured, seven seriously; in Paris alone police reported a record 855 arrests¹. Town halls were stormed in Limoges, where the 19th-century building burned, in Marseille and in Lille, and traders’ unions said more than 1,500 shops and businesses had been ransacked¹.

On Sunday at 8pm Emmanuel Macron addressed the country². He drew a hard line between the “plusieurs centaines de milliers”, several hundred thousand people, who marched with legitimate worries about the cost of living, fuel prices and schools, and those who “destroy, ransack and loot”^1,2. Then he set out a method in three parts². Prefects, with mayors, may ban certain gatherings. Parties and unions are asked to condemn violence without ambiguity. And this week the prime minister will bring pupils, students, teachers, unions, employers, local authorities and parliamentarians to one table to work on concrete proposals. The education ministry’s consultation platform has collected more than 100,000 contributions². Macron also said he would travel to the Gulf states to secure fuel and gas supplies².

Cynics will call a meeting a non-answer. The small print says otherwise. The government has already promised 3,000 more substitute teachers, a place for students in school decision-making, and has scrapped planned increases in some university registration fees³. That is the protesters’ original complaint, missing teachers and crumbling classrooms, answered in payroll lines rather than adjectives. The school protests began in late September, a week into the school year³, and they asked for staff, not slogans.

The harder question is the state’s own competence. The mayor of Limoges said his municipal police ran out of ammunition at about 3.30pm and called it “a colossal failure of the state”; politicians on the left and the right called for the interior minister’s resignation¹. Macron asked the government to draw every lesson on intelligence and anticipation and promised full transparency². That is a promise with a deliverable, an after-action report, and it should be held to one.

The constructive part is the calendar. France votes for a new president in April 2027³, and Macron’s own framing on Sunday was that the argument belongs in public meetings, newspapers and peaceful rallies, not in the street². Institutions that answer peaceful demands with budget lines and violent ones with courts are doing their job, slowly and without applause. …

Continue in reading view →

Your feed this weekend showed fire: burning barricades in Paris, a torched town hall in Limoges, a wrecked carabinieri car in Milan^2,3. Those images are real. They are also a biased sample, and the bias runs in a predictable direction.

By the French president’s own count, several hundred thousand people demonstrated on Saturday with legitimate demands¹. The Guardian describes tens of thousands of peaceful marchers in major cities, parents, teachers and grandparents among them, separate from the groups that surprised the police and from the looters who followed². Nearly 2,400 arrests is a large number. Set against several hundred thousand marchers, it is a small share. The camera, though, goes where the fire is.

Psychologists call this the availability heuristic: what comes to mind easily feels common. A burning building is easy to remember; a peaceful march of grandparents is not. The result is that a weekend gets remembered by its worst hour, and a cause gets judged by its worst participants.

The useful habit is the denominator. Lyon’s mayor, Grégory Doucet, asked for a “sense of nuance” and for “avoiding stereotypes”². Milan’s mayor, Giuseppe Sala, called the reasons for the protest “understandable” and the violence “not justifiable”³. Both are denominator sentences: they keep the many and the few in separate columns.

Leaders know the bias, and lean on it in both directions. Portugal’s prime minister warned rivals against “importing” climates of instability that, he said, “have no support in Portuguese society”, while hundreds camped in Lisbon’s Rossio Square over rents³. Both can be true at once. The camp is small. The housing numbers behind it are not.

The Federal Reserve has entered its communications blackout ahead of its 28 October decision¹. For a week the most-quoted committee in the world says nothing in public, and that is a feature, not a gap. When the speakers go quiet, the data has the floor.

There is plenty of it. UK inflation for September arrives on Wednesday, after 3.1% in August; markets had priced a 95% chance that the Bank of England raises rates on 5 November, CMC Markets wrote on Friday². The People’s Bank of China sets its lending rates on Tuesday, euro-area consumer confidence comes on Thursday, and on Friday the euro-area purchasing managers’ surveys and Japan’s September inflation². CMC also notes that markets expect the Fed itself to raise rates sooner than the Bank of England, after hotter-than-expected September consumer and producer prices in the United States².

Beijing is the quiet exception. Economists largely expect the People’s Bank to hold its benchmark lending rates through the rest of the year and leave the work to fiscal measures, such as the 550 billion yuan of unused debt quota passed to local governments in early October³.

Currencies are waiting too. The yen barely moved this morning at 157.89 per dollar, and the offshore yuan held at 6.6839¹.

The desk’s view is old-fashioned. A committee that talks every day trains markets to trade adjectives. A blackout sends everyone back to the invoice: what prices actually did last month, measured by statisticians who do not give interviews. You can do the same this week. Skip the previews. Read the releases.

If your home is heated with oil, your heating bill works differently from your neighbour’s. Gas and electricity arrive by the month, smoothed and averaged. Heating oil arrives by lorry, once or twice a year, and the price on the day of the order is the price of the winter.

That price, by the national average the comparison portal tanke-günstig publishes for a 2,000-litre order, was €177.59 per 100 litres late on Sunday¹. The spread between the Länder is wide: €171.90 in Saxony-Anhalt, €183.91 in Hesse, €174.90 in Berlin¹. On Friday the portal noted that heating oil had fallen by almost ten cents a litre since the start of October, unlike motor fuels¹. ADAC’s last weekly reading still had diesel at €2.247 a litre².

Part of the bill is not set by the market at all. The portal estimates that taxes made up about 40% of the end price in 2025, with the CO₂ levy alone at about 17.7%, more than the energy tax itself¹. That part is known in advance and changes by law, on a date, which makes it the most predictable line on the invoice.

The ordinary lesson is not “order now”. This desk does not give that advice, and nobody can time a war. It is that a once-a-year bill rewards knowing your own numbers: tank size, last winter’s litres, what you paid per 100 litres. The household arithmetic for a typical order is in “In euros at home” at the end of this edition.

And a word for the dull machinery. The depot schedulers, drivers and invoicing clerks who get a full tank into a cellar in Hesse in a month like this one are among the least celebrated parts of Europe’s energy system. They are also a part that works.

Friday’s selling in chipmakers, which took the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index down 3.8%², is usually told as a story about mood. The more useful version is told in bond prices.

CoreWeave’s most-traded bonds, paying 9.75% and due in 2031, traded as low as 78 cents on the dollar on 14 October, a yield of 16.39%, having started October at about 85¹. Its 9.625% bonds due 2032 slumped to 75, for a 16.5% yield, against 103.625 on 2 June¹. Both recovered some ground the next day, to 83 and 80¹. In the same week the data-centre developer Cipher Digital announced an $850 million offering of zero-coupon convertible notes, and JPMorgan analysts cut Applied Digital’s project bonds to neutral, citing a looming “supply overhang” of debt still to be raised¹.

That is the mechanism. Much of the AI build-out is financed by lenders who expect to be paid back in fixed instalments. When the price of that debt rises, the cost of every future data centre rises with it, and the shares of companies selling into those data centres get marked down in sympathy. It is not a verdict on the technology. It is a repricing of the loan.

The same report carries the counter-signal. CleanSpark’s bonds held up better, helped by good news from its client Meta, after investors read early retention data for Meta’s Muse assistant as evidence that the company can earn money on its AI spending¹. Meta reports on Wednesday, alongside Tesla, Lam Research and Texas Instruments³.

Those reports are the invoices. Read three lines: capital spending, cash flow, and who is paying whom. The rest is the podium.

On 11 October President Trump announced that Russia and Ukraine had agreed to an “energy ceasefire”, without giving details¹. A week later both sides are publishing counts, and neither count is zero.

Zelenskyy wrote on Sunday that Russia had attacked Ukraine’s energy, oil and gas sectors 76 times in the week since the announcement, that facilities in four regions had been struck overnight, and that tens of thousands of families were without power¹. Kyiv had initially said it was observing the ceasefire, then resumed strikes on Russian oil facilities on Thursday after a three-day pause¹. On Sunday Russia’s defence ministry said it had destroyed 1,015 Ukrainian drones over 15 regions, Crimea and the Black Sea. In St Petersburg the oil terminal and the Ruchi oil depot caught fire; one person was killed and five wounded, the regional governor said¹.

Diplomacy runs alongside. Zelenskyy said US-Ukraine intelligence sharing had resumed after being “blocked for some period of time”, and that he had spoken with the envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner about next steps¹. Trump, defending his sanctions waiver, wrote that he did not want to drive Russia “away from the bargaining table” and that “great progress is being made”^1,2.

The desk’s view: a ceasefire without a verification mechanism is a podium. It becomes a print when someone neutral starts counting. What would make this one real is dull to the point of tedium: an agreed list of covered facilities, a start time, a reporting channel and a third party that logs incidents and publishes them. None of that has been made public.

Until it is, read both numbers, 76 and 1,015, for what they are. They are not evidence that a ceasefire failed. They are evidence that one has not yet been built. Ceasefires that hold are almost always the boring kind, with an annex.

The storm Spain calls dana Adam, a cut-off low, entered its most adverse phase on Sunday, and the state weather agency AEMET expected it to last into Monday¹. AEMET kept a red warning, its highest level, on the coast of southern Valencia province and northern Alicante, for 90 litres per square metre in an hour and accumulations of 200 litres in 12 hours and 300 in 24¹. The Balearics were lowered to orange on Sunday afternoon; Andalusia and Murcia stayed on orange¹.

The gauges were already filling. On Sunday AEMET’s stations recorded 149.6 litres per square metre in Miramar, 135.4 in Pego and 131.7 in Oliva, and the regional association Avamet measured almost 250 litres in Barx by 18:50¹. On Saturday a woman in Cabrera de Mar, north of Barcelona, was swept away while crossing a flooded street with her family; her body was found on Sunday¹. AEMET warned that much of the rain is falling on ground that is already saturated¹.

There is a temperature story underneath. Before the cold front arrived on Saturday, temperatures across the northern half of the peninsula had been about ten degrees above normal; by Sunday they were back to normal or slightly below¹.

Valencia has reason to know that the most important part of a storm is the instruction attached to it. AEMET’s spokesman, Rubén del Campo, called it “fundamental” to follow the civil-protection advice and not to travel unless strictly necessary¹. A red warning is only infrastructure if it arrives in time, is believed and is acted on. That chain, forecaster to phone to person, is now being tested on the Safor coast.

The constructive part is that the chain exists, is public and is specific: litres per hour, named coasts, named hours. AEMET expects the instability to ease from Tuesday¹. The second test comes then, in the claims and the clean-up, and it is just as dull and just as important.