Inside DeskANYWHERE

Twice-daily brief for people who prefer incentives to applause.

Berlin time Support (keeps it free)

Evening edition · Wednesday, 4 November 2026

PSYCHOLOGY · THE ANNEX

The Annex: 7.3 million congressional messages, and why the attack gets 80% more retweets

A study of fourteen years of posts and newsletters from US lawmakers finds attacks on the other party paid off online, while bipartisan work and help for constituents did worse than average. The authors call it a mirage.

The document. “Measuring Partisanship and Representation in Online Congressional Communications”, by Michael Kistner of the University of Houston and five co-authors, in the American Political Science Review1. It covers members of the US Congress from 2009 to 2022: about 4.7 million posts on Twitter, 2.4 million on Facebook and 184,000 official email newsletters1. Desk arithmetic: roughly 7.3 million messages in all. On the day after a midterm, it is worth reading what the campaign looked like when nobody was campaigning.

The line. On Twitter, negative partisan attacks received 60% more likes, 80% more retweets and 79% more replies than an average post by the same politician1. On Facebook, they drew 86% more shares and 93% more comments1. Messages about bipartisan work or services for the local district did worse than the typical post, and so did claiming credit for something government had delivered1.

The lines around it. Attacks made up about five to ten per cent of messages in the early years and nearly twenty per cent by the end of 20221. Language-based partisanship rose across all three channels from 20111. Measured this way, Democratic rhetoric showed no statistically significant trend over the decade, while Republican rhetoric moved strongly towards the extremes1. The sharpest rise in Democratic attack messages came after the 2016 election; the Republican spike followed 20201. Messages about funding for the district or helping constituents did not keep pace1.

The caveats. The data stop in 2022, before the rise of newer, more partisan platforms1. Messages were classified by language models trained on a hand-coded subset; the authors checked the scores against roll-call votes, fundraising and bill sponsorship, and they lined up well1. Engagement measures what a polarised online audience rewards, not what the electorate wants.

The constructive reading. The researchers point to separate surveys in which most voters say they prefer representatives who focus on legislative work over partisan bickering1. They warn of a “social media feedback mirage”, in which politicians mistake likes and shares for support1. That is a fixable error. The dull jobs that score badly online, such as answering a constituent’s letter, securing a grant, or co-signing a bill with the other side, are still what the voters who were counted this week say they want. A politician who checks the casework queue before the retweet count is reading the better metric.

What to watch

  • Whether follow-up work extends the data past 2022 to Bluesky, Truth Social, YouTube and Instagram; the authors say it has not yet been done1.
Desk comment

Applause is a measure of the room, not of the town.

Sources

  1. Social media rewards politicians for negative partisan attacks, study finds — PsyPost, 04 Nov 2026.

Every figure in this piece traces to a source above or to the desk’s own arithmetic on those sources, marked as such. Quotations are short and attributed. Spot an error? Write to the desk; corrections are logged on the method page.

Commentary for information only. Not investment, legal, tax, medical or political advice. Not an offer or solicitation. Analysis may be incomplete or wrong. Charts show published public data, not a trading feed; binding numbers live with the institutions that publish them.